• Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Write For Us
  • Our Team
Extraction Magazine
No Result
View All Result
  • Botanical Extraction
    • Cannabinoids
    • Psychedelics
    • Nutraceutical
    • Product Refinement
  • Industry News
    • Business
    • Sustainability
    • Safety & Compliance
    • Partners
  • Extraction Technology
    • Equipment
    • Methods
    • Solvents
    • DIY Extraction
    • Analytical Techniques
  • Medical Research
  • Glossary
  • Business Directory
  • Botanical Extraction
    • Cannabinoids
    • Psychedelics
    • Nutraceutical
    • Product Refinement
  • Industry News
    • Business
    • Sustainability
    • Safety & Compliance
    • Partners
  • Extraction Technology
    • Equipment
    • Methods
    • Solvents
    • DIY Extraction
    • Analytical Techniques
  • Medical Research
  • Glossary
  • Business Directory
No Result
View All Result
Extraction Magazine
No Result
View All Result
Home Extraction Technology

Hemp Seed Oil Extraction: Propane vs. Supercritical Carbon Dioxide

Lance Griffin by Lance Griffin
January 30, 2020
in Extraction Technology, Methods
Hemp Seed Oil Extraction: Propane vs. Supercritical Carbon Dioxide

Most extractors of Cannabis sativa L. are familiar with the phytochemical potential of feminized flowers. But cannabis/hemp seeds are treasures in their own right. Hempseed oil is rich in minerals, contains all nine essential amino acids, and features an ideal ratio of omega-6 fatty acid linoleic acid to omega-3 fatty acid α-linolenic acid. [1] Hempseed oil may very well become a major household superfood. But it must first be extracted.

When converting these super seeds into oil, preservation of nutrition and quality are paramount. This is best achieved with supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) extraction. The challenge is that a lack of solubility in sCO2 and subsequent pressure requirements reduce mass yields and increase production costs compared to extraction with organic solvents at atmospheric conditions. In 2019, Grijó and colleagues set out to determine how pressurized n-propane compares to sCO2 in terms of chemical and physical qualities of extracted hempseed oil. [2]

READ ALSO

How Much Does It Cost to Build a GMP-Ready Extraction Facility?

The Future of Cannabis Beverages Under FDA Oversight: Formulation, Labeling, and Manufacturing Challenges

CO2 reaches a supercritical state at 7.38 megapascal (MPa) and 31.06°C, while n-propane requires 4.25 MPa and 96.70 °C. The researchers conducted four extractions with sCO2, namely 40°C and 60°C at 30 MPa and 40 MPa. These extraction conditions required 240 minutes each.

For n-propane, researchers dialed in five conditions, namely 40°C and 60°C at 6 and 10 MPa in addition to 50°C at 8 MPa. Propane required 30-minute extraction runs. The researchers also performed a conventional extraction operation using hexane and isopropanol at atmospheric conditions for comparison.

sCO2 and n-propane extractions preserved the omega-6 to omega-3 ratio, but neither reached the mass yield levels of conventional organic solvents. However, smaller amounts of n-propane were required to achieve comparable yields with sCO2. Interestingly, the milder pressure conditions of n-propane reduced the quantified acidity of the oil extract. The n-propane extracts also possessed increased levels of tocopherols and β-carotene. Because much lower pressures were required, the study authors highlighted lower operating costs for n-propane. They concluded that “pressurized n-propane is an interesting alternative solvent to obtain the oil of hemp seeds in relation to supercritical carbon dioxide and conventional technique.” [2]

References

  1. Rodriguez-Leyva, Delfin, and Grant N Pierce. “The Cardiac and Haemostatic Effects of Dietary Hempseed.” Nutrition & Metabolism,7, no. 32, 2010, doi:10.1186/1743-7075-7-32. Journal Impact Factor = 2.518, Times Cited = 17 (ResearchGate)
  2. Grijó DR, et al. “Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) Seed Oil Extraction with Pressurized n-Propane and Supercritical Carbon Dioxide.” The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, vol.143, 2019, pp.268-274. Journal Impact Factor = 3.481, Times Cited = 2 (ScienceDirect)
Tags: CO2 Extraction

Related Posts

Botanical Extraction

How Much Does It Cost to Build a GMP-Ready Extraction Facility?

October 30, 2026
The Future of Cannabis Beverages Under FDA Oversight: Formulation, Labeling, and Manufacturing Challenges
Extraction Technology

The Future of Cannabis Beverages Under FDA Oversight: Formulation, Labeling, and Manufacturing Challenges

October 22, 2026
Will Cannabis Extractors Need Quality Departments Like Food Manufacturers?
Botanical Extraction

Will Cannabis Extractors Need Quality Departments Like Food Manufacturers?

October 20, 2026
What Cannabis Manufacturers Can Learn from Food Processing
Botanical Extraction

What Cannabis Manufacturers Can Learn from Food Processing

October 16, 2026
Empty executive conference room prepared for an industry roundtable on extraction regulation and manufacturing compliance.
Extraction Technology

Executive Roundtable: Industry Leaders Predict the Next Five Years of Extraction Regulation

October 12, 2026
Large-scale hemp cultivation facility with rows of cannabis plants under greenhouse lighting
Botanical Extraction

How the 2018 Farm Bill Created Today’s Hemp Industry

October 6, 2026
Next Post
The Trouble with the USDA’s Interim Final Rule

The Trouble with the USDA’s Interim Final Rule

Sitemap

© 2026 Extraction Magazine is the trusted provider of botanical extraction news and the leading media in the ever-changing extraction industry.

No Result
View All Result
  • Industry News
  • Botanical Extraction
  • Medical Research
  • Medical Research
  • Glossary
  • Our Team
  • Write For Us

© 2026 Extraction Magazine is the trusted provider of botanical extraction news and the leading media in the ever-changing extraction industry.