• Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Write For Us
  • Our Team
Extraction Magazine
No Result
View All Result
  • Botanical Extraction
    • Cannabinoids
    • Psychedelics
    • Nutraceutical
    • Product Refinement
  • Industry News
    • Business
    • Sustainability
    • Safety & Compliance
    • Partners
  • Extraction Technology
    • Equipment
    • Methods
    • Solvents
    • DIY Extraction
    • Analytical Techniques
  • Medical Research
  • Glossary
  • Business Directory
  • Botanical Extraction
    • Cannabinoids
    • Psychedelics
    • Nutraceutical
    • Product Refinement
  • Industry News
    • Business
    • Sustainability
    • Safety & Compliance
    • Partners
  • Extraction Technology
    • Equipment
    • Methods
    • Solvents
    • DIY Extraction
    • Analytical Techniques
  • Medical Research
  • Glossary
  • Business Directory
No Result
View All Result
Extraction Magazine
No Result
View All Result
Home Industry News

Cannabis Extraction Equipment Expenditures in Relation to Total Cost of Ownership

Anthony DiMeo by Anthony DiMeo
November 27, 2021
in Industry News
Cannabis Extraction Equipment Expenditures in Relation to Total Cost of Ownership

It’s no secret that owning and operating in the cannabis extraction field can be a costly endeavor. For business owners that want to be able better gauge the actual costs of their cannabis extraction equipment, a Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) formula calculation is ideal.

The TCO breakdown relates to all manners of commercial extraction. This includes solvent-based techniques of mass production such as supercritical carbon dioxide (CO2) extraction, Soxhlet extraction, dynamic maceration, ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE), and microwave-assisted extraction.

READ ALSO

What Happens if Hemp-Derived THC Products Face New Federal Restrictions?

How the 2018 Farm Bill Created Today’s Hemp Industry

The first criteria to consider is initial cost (I). This is the up-front purchase price of equipment such as chromatography systems, solvent recovery systems, heat exchangers, and recycling options. Typically, just a drop in the bucket as far as total cost, this cost can represent less than 10% of the TCO.

Operation cost (O) is tied to the cost to install and test machinery like the chromatographic and solvent removal equipment, as well as training employees to operate them. Training can cost business owners higher rates as the machinery acquired becomes more operationally-advanced.

Maintenance cost (M) includes service and upkeep that ensure proper working condition. Unexpected malfunctions of equipment are listed under this criterion.

Cost of downtime (D) relates to the labor costs of employees unable to execute job duties due to equipment malfunctions. This cost can also relate to indirect labor costs from any lost production, profitability, or additional management needed while unable to deliver product according to a set standard operating procedure.

Production cost (P) takes into consideration different levels of output and quality for the equipment in relation to any established metric of production activity your company sets. The industry has seen many companies concentrate on sustainability and quality, thus making something like supercritical CO2 extraction a wise business move that compensates for the higher initial cost of acquiring the equipment.

The final criteria in calculating a TCO is remaining value (R). This measurement documents the equipment’s value over the long haul and how it will compare to extraction market rates several years down the road.

The metrics featured above can then be calculated as the following: I + O + M + D + P – R = TCO.

 

Extraction companies can analyze the results from calculating the above TCO equation, which will lead to a sounder budget to project costs within the ever-expanding and fast-moving extraction landscape.

 

Image: https://www.pngegg.com/en/png-kqfbz

Related Posts

Hemp-derived CBD oil and topical product containers displayed with hemp leaves on a wooden platform
Industry News

What Happens if Hemp-Derived THC Products Face New Federal Restrictions?

October 6, 2026
Large-scale hemp cultivation facility with rows of cannabis plants under greenhouse lighting
Botanical Extraction

How the 2018 Farm Bill Created Today’s Hemp Industry

October 6, 2026
Cannabis leaves and cookies representing cannabinoid-infused consumer food products
Botanical Extraction

Could FDA Become the Primary Regulator of Consumable Cannabinoids?

October 2, 2026
AI-powered cannabis cultivation system optimizing terpene and cannabinoid production with real-time data analytics
Business

How AI-Designed Formulas Just Cracked the $2.3B Terpene Code

July 14, 2025
Cannabis oil and concentrates representing the booming extracts market projected at $16.6 billion in 2025
Business

Cannabis Extracts Market Projected at US $16.6 B in 2025

July 7, 2025
Transparent cannabis leave, sci-fi, futuristic-looking, in a lab setting.
Business

AI & IoT‑Powered Process Control in Cannabis Extraction Is Here

July 1, 2025
Next Post
Fast Centrifugal Partition Chromatography

Fast Centrifugal Partition Chromatography

Sitemap

© 2026 Extraction Magazine is the trusted provider of botanical extraction news and the leading media in the ever-changing extraction industry.

No Result
View All Result
  • Industry News
  • Botanical Extraction
  • Medical Research
  • Medical Research
  • Glossary
  • Our Team
  • Write For Us

© 2026 Extraction Magazine is the trusted provider of botanical extraction news and the leading media in the ever-changing extraction industry.