• Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Write For Us
  • Our Team
Extraction Magazine
No Result
View All Result
  • Botanical Extraction
    • Cannabinoids
    • Psychedelics
    • Nutraceutical
    • Product Refinement
  • Industry News
    • Business
    • Sustainability
    • Safety & Compliance
    • Partners
  • Extraction Technology
    • Equipment
    • Methods
    • Solvents
    • DIY Extraction
    • Analytical Techniques
  • Medical Research
  • Glossary
  • Business Directory
  • Botanical Extraction
    • Cannabinoids
    • Psychedelics
    • Nutraceutical
    • Product Refinement
  • Industry News
    • Business
    • Sustainability
    • Safety & Compliance
    • Partners
  • Extraction Technology
    • Equipment
    • Methods
    • Solvents
    • DIY Extraction
    • Analytical Techniques
  • Medical Research
  • Glossary
  • Business Directory
No Result
View All Result
Extraction Magazine
No Result
View All Result
Home Industry News

Cartridge Contaminants?

Extraction Magazine by Extraction Magazine
July 1, 2019
in Industry News
Cartridge Contaminants?

Potential Ways that Cartridge Quality and Design Can Affect the Extracts You

Vaping cannabis has experienced a surge in popularity. On the customer side, vape pens are considered to be more discreet, are seen as less dangerous due to the lack of carcinogenic combustion byproducts, and can be matched to a person’s personality and cannabis use style. On the manufacturer’s side, vape pens are cheaper to produce than full spectrum extracts, and easier to optimize and improve with Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC).

Although cannabis flower and distillates in most states must undergo rigorous testing protocols before being approved for sale on the market, recent changes in cannabis testing laws in states that allow medical and adult-use cannabis have revealed a potential for concern. These new laws have set a much lower threshold for the maximum amount of the heavy metal contaminant lead (atomic symbol Pb) in various cannabis products. Testing of cartridge contents has demonstrated unacceptable levels of lead under these new guidelines, even when the distillates originally placed inside did not test positively for excessive lead levels. This raises the index of suspicion that the contaminating lead may be coming from the cartridges themselves.

READ ALSO

How Much Does It Cost to Build a GMP-Ready Extraction Facility?

What Happens to Small Brands if Regulations Become More Complex?

Here are some of the new state testing requirements as of January 1st, 2019:

  • California prohibits any amount of lead over 0.5 parts per million (ppm). [1]
  • By comparison, the current Washington standard for maximal legal limits of lead in cannabis products, reported in micrograms per 5 gram submitted sample, is 6.0—or in other words, 1.2 ppm. [2]
  • Oregon does not yet have a standard in place for heavy metal testing of cannabis products.
  • Colorado set their legal lead limit based on the cannabis-containing product [3]:
    • Inhaled products, nasal sprays, or metered dose inhalers: less than 0.5 ppm.
    • Topical and/or transdermal: less than 10 ppm.
    • Products for oral consumption or suppositories: less than 1 ppm.

Researchers at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health have demonstrated that direct contact of e-cigarette liquids with metallic heating coils contributes to higher levels of heavy metals in the resulting aerosols. [4] It’s also possible that the acidic pH of the cannabis distillate is dissolving heavy metals from the cartridge over time, which all have increasing solubility in acidic solutions. Whatever the case may be, lead toxicity can lead to irreversible physiological injury, so the exact reason for this contamination must be investigated until a solution is found.

References

  1. California Code of Regulations. Title 16, Division 42: Bureau of Cannabis Control § 5723. Accessed June 23, 2019 (Page 112).
  2. Washington State Legislature. WAC 314-55-102: Quality Assurance Testing. Part (1) Quality assurance fields of testing, section (e) Heavy metal screening. Accessed June 23, 2019.
  3. Colorado Code of Regulations. 1 CCR 212-2. R 712 – Retail Marijuana Testing Facilities: Sampling and Testing Program, Part E, Section 4.
  4. Olmedo, P. et al. “Metal Concentrations in e-Cigarette Liquid and Aerosol Samples: The Contribution of Metallic Coils”. Environ Health Perspect. 2018; 126(2): 027010 [Times cited = 33, Journal impact factor = 9.780].

Image Credit: Flickr

Related Posts

Botanical Extraction

How Much Does It Cost to Build a GMP-Ready Extraction Facility?

October 30, 2026
Botanical Extraction

What Happens to Small Brands if Regulations Become More Complex?

October 29, 2026
Business

What Consumers Actually Want From Cannabis-Infused Products, and What Extractors Can Learn From Food and Supplements

October 28, 2026
Botanical Extraction

Functional Beverages and Extract Ingredients: What Extractors Can Learn from Food and Supplements

October 27, 2026
Botanical Extraction

Why Are Brands Diversifying Beyond Cannabis, and What Should Extractors Borrow From Food and Supplements?

October 27, 2026
Botanical Extraction

Mushroom Extracts: The Next Regulatory Frontier? What Extractors Can Learn from Food, Pharma and Supplements

October 23, 2026
Next Post

Health Benefits of Vaping CBD

Sitemap

© 2026 Extraction Magazine is the trusted provider of botanical extraction news and the leading media in the ever-changing extraction industry.

No Result
View All Result
  • Industry News
  • Botanical Extraction
  • Medical Research
  • Medical Research
  • Glossary
  • Our Team
  • Write For Us

© 2026 Extraction Magazine is the trusted provider of botanical extraction news and the leading media in the ever-changing extraction industry.